完整版真题免费下载
+答案解析请参考文末
Note: For any geometry problem whose statement begins with an asterisk (), the first page of the solution must be a large, in-scale, clearly labeled diagram. Failure to meet this requirement will result in an automatic 1-point deduction.
Prove that there are infinitely many distinct pairs??of relatively prime positive integers?
?and?
?such that?
?is divisible by?
Consider the equation
(a) Prove that there are infinitely many pairs??of positive integers satisfying the equation.
(b) Describe all pairs??of positive integers satisfying the equation.
() Let?
?be an equilateral triangle and let?
?be a point on its circumcircle. Let lines?
?and?
?intersect at?
; let lines?
?and?
intersect at?
; and let lines?
?and?
?intersect at?
. Prove that the area of triangle?
?is twice the area of triangle?
.
Note: For any geometry problem whose statement begins with an asterisk (), the first page of the solution must be a large, in-scale, clearly labeled diagram. Failure to meet this requirement will result in an automatic 1-point deduction.
Are there any triples??of positive integers such that?
?is a prime that properly divides the positive number?
?
() Let?
?and?
?be the circumcenter and the orthocenter of an acute triangle?
. Points?
?and?
?lie on side?
?such that?
and?
. Ray?
?intersects the circumcircle of triangle?
?in point?
. Prove that?
.
Let??be?
?distinct points on the unit circle?
?other than?
. Each point is colored either red or blue, with exactly?
of them red and exactly?
?of them blue. Let?
?be any ordering of the red points. Let?
?be the nearest blue point to?
?traveling counterclockwise around the circle starting from?
. Then let?
?be the nearest of the remaining blue points to?
?traveling counterclockwise around the circle from?
, and so on, until we have labeled all the blue points?
. Show that the number of counterclockwise arcs of the form?
?that contain the point?
?is independent of the way we chose the ordering?
?of the red points.
Let??and?
. We see that?
. Therefore, we have?
, as desired.
Let??be odd where?
. We have?
?so?
?This means that
?and since x is odd,?
?or?
?as desired.
Because problems such as this usually are related to expressions along the lines of?, it's tempting to try these. After a few cases, we see that?
?is convenient due to the repeated occurrence of?
?when squared and added. We rewrite the given expressions as:
After repeatedly factoring the initial equation,we can get:
Expanding each of the squares, we can compute each product independently then sum them:
Now we place the values back into the expression:
Plugging any positive integer value for?
?into?
?yields a valid solution, because there is an infinite number of positive integers, there is an infinite number of distinct pairs?
.
We have?, which can be expressed as?
. At this point, we
think of substitution. A substitution of form??is slightly derailed by the leftover x and y terms, so
instead, seeing the xy in front, we substitute?. This leaves us with?
, so?
. Expanding yields?
. Rearranging, we have
. To satisfy this equation in integers,?
?must obviously be a?
?power, and further inspection shows
that it must also be odd. Also, since it is a square and all odd squares are 1 mod 8, every odd sixth power gives a
solution. Since the problem asks for positive integers, the pair??does not work. We go to the next highest odd
?power,?
?or?
. In this case,?
, so the LHS is?
, so?
. Using the original
substitution yields??as the first solution. We have shown part a by showing that there are an infinite
number of positive integer solutions for?, which can then be manipulated into solutions for?
. To solve part
b, we look back at the original method of generating solutions. Define??and?
?to be the pair representing the nth
solution. Since the nth odd number is?,?
. It follows that?
. From our original substitution,?
.
First, we shall prove a lemma:
LEMMA:
PROOF: Expanding and simplifying the right side, we find that
which proves our lemma.
Now, we have thatRearranging and getting rid of the denominator, we have that
Factoring, we have
Dividing both sides, we have
Now, since the LHS is the 6th power of a rational number, and the RHS is an integer, the RHS must be a perfect 6th power. Define?
. By inspection,?
?must be a positive odd integer satistisfying?
. We also have
Now, we can solve for?
?and?
?in terms of?
:?
?and?
. Now we have:
and it is trivial to check that this parameterization works for all such?
?(to keep?
?and?
?integral), which implies part (a).
MOTIVATION FOR LEMMA: I expanded the LHS, noticed the coefficients were?, and immediately thought of binomial coefficients. Looking at Pascal's triangle, it was then easy to find and prove the lemma.
-sunfishho
So named because it is a mix of solutions 1 and 2 but differs in other aspects. After fruitless searching, let?,?
. Clearly?
. Then?
.
Change the LHS to?. Change the RHS to?
. Therefore?
. Let?
, and note that?
?is an integer. Therefore?
. Because?
,?
?is odd and?
?because?
. Therefore, substituting for?
?and?
?we get:?
.
WLOG, let?. Let?
, and?
. After some angle chasing, we find that?
?and?
. Therefore,?
?~?
.
Lemma 1: If , then?
. This lemma results directly from the fact that?
?~?
;?
, or?
.
Lemma 2: . We see that?
, as desired.
Lemma 3: . We see that
However, after some angle chasing and by the Law of Sines in?
, we have?
, or?
, which implies the result.
By the area lemma, we have ?and?
.
We see that?. Thus, it suffices to show that?
, or?
. Rearranging, we find this to be equivalent to?
, which is Lemma 3, so the result has been proven.
We will use barycentric coordinates and vectors. Let??be the position vector of a point?
?The point?
?in barycentric coordinates denotes the point?
?For all points in the plane of?
?we have?
?It is clear that?
;?
; and?
Define the point??as?
?The fact that?
?lies on the circumcircle of?
?gives us?
?This, along with the condition?
?inherent to barycentric coordinates, gives us?
We can write the equations of the following lines:
We can then solve for the points?:
The area of an arbitrary triangle??is:
To calculate??we wish to compute?
?After a lot of computation, we obtain the following:
Evaluating the denominator,
Since??and?
?it follows that:
We thus conclude that:
From this, it follows that??and we are done.
We'll use coordinates and shoelace. Let the origin be the midpoint of?
. Let?
, and?
, then?
. Using the facts?
?and?
, we have?
, so?
, and?
.
The slope of??is
It is well-known that?
?is self-polar, so?
?is the polar of?
, i.e.,?
?is perpendicular to?
. Therefore, the slope of?
?is?
. Since?
, we get the x-coordinate of?
,?
, i.e.,?
. Using shoelace,
So?
. Q.E.D
Yes. Let?. Also define?
. We want?
?to divide the positive number?
. This equality can be verified by expanding the righthand side. Because?
?will be trivially positive if?
?is non-negative, we can just assume that?
. Analyzing the structure of?
, we see that?
,
, and?
?must be?
?or?
?mod?
, or?
?will not be prime (divisibility by?
?and?
). Thus, we can guess any?
,
, and?
?which satisfies those constraints. For example,?
,
, and?
?works.?
?is prime, and it divides the positive number?
.
This solution is wrong. No??actually exist.
Suppose ray??intersects the circumcircle of?
?at?
, and let the foot of the A-altitude of?
?be?
. Note that?
. Likewise,?
. So,?
.?
?is cyclic, so?
. Also,?
. These two angles are on different circles and have the same measure, but they point to the same line?
! Hence, the two circles must be congruent. (This is also a well-known result)
We know, since??is the midpoint of?
, that?
?is perpendicular to?
.?
?is also perpendicular to?
, so the two lines are parallel.?
?is a transversal, so?
. We wish to prove that?
, which is equivalent to?
?being cyclic.
Now, assume that ray??intersects the circumcircle of?
?at a point?
. Point?
?must be the midpoint of?
. Also, since?
?is an angle bisector, it must also hit the circle at the point?
. The two circles are congruent, which implies?
NDP is isosceles. Angle ADN is an exterior angle, so?
. Assume WLOG that?
. So,?
. In addition,?
. Combining these two equations,?
.
Opposite angles sum to?, so quadrilateral?
?is cyclic, and the condition is proved.
I define a sequence to be, starting at??and tracing the circle counterclockwise, and writing the color of the points in that order - either R or B. For example, possible sequences include?
,?
,?
,?
, etc. Note that choosing an?
?is equivalent to choosing an?
?in a sequence, and?
?is defined as the?
?closest to?
?when moving rightwards. If no?
s exist to the right of?
, start from the far left. For example, if I have the above example?
, and I define the 2nd?
?to be?
, then the first?
?will be?
. Because no?
?or?
can be named twice, I can simply remove?
?and?
?from my sequence when I choose them. I define this to be a move. Hence, a possible move sequence of?
?is:?
Note that, if, in a move, ?appears to the left of?
, then?
?intersects?
Now, I define a commencing??to be a?
?which appears to the left of all?
s, and a terminating?
?to be a?
?which appears to the right of all?
s. Let the amount of commencing?
s be?
, and the amount of terminating?
s be?
, I claim that the number of arcs which cross?
?is constant, and it is equal to?
. I will show this with induction.
Base case is when?. In this case, there are only two possible sequences -?
?and?
. In the first case,?
?does not cross?
, but both?
?and?
?are?
, so?
. In the second example,?
,?
, so?
.?
?crosses?
?since?
?appears to the left of?
, so there is one arc which intersects. Hence, the base case is proved.
For the inductive step, suppose that for a positive number?, the number of arcs which cross?
?is constant, and given by?
?for any configuration. Now, I will show it for?
.
Suppose I first choose??such that?
?is to the right of?
?in the sequence. This implies that?
?does not cross?
. But, neither?
?nor?
?is a commencing?
?or terminating?
. These numbers remain constant, and now after this move we have a sequence of length?
. Hence, by assumption, the total amount of arcs is?
.
Now suppose that??appears to the right of?
, but?
?is not a commencing?
. This implies that there are no commencing?
s in the series, because there are no?
s to the left of?
, so?
. Note that this arc does intersect?
, and?
?must be a terminating?
.?
?must be a terminating?
?because there are no?
s to the right of?
, or else that?
?would be?
. The?
?length sequence that remains has?
commencing?
s and?
?terminating?
s. Hence, by assumption, the total amount of arcs is?
.
Finally, suppose that??appears to the right of?
, and?
?is a commencing?
. We know that this arc will cross?
. Analogous to the previous case,?
?is a terminating?
, so the?
?length sequence which remains has?
?commencing?
s and?
?terminating?
s. Hence, by assumption, the total amount of arcs is?
.
There are no more possible cases, hence the induction is complete, and the number of arcs which intersect??is indeed a constant which is given by?
.
? 2025. All Rights Reserved. 沪ICP备2023009024号-1