完整版真题免费下载
+答案解析请参考文末
Find, with proof, all positive integers??for which?
?is a perfect square.
Let?,?
,?
?be positive real numbers such that?
. Prove that
For a point??in the coordinate plane, let?
?denote the line passing through?
?with slope?
. Consider the set of triangles with vertices of the form?
,?
,?
, such that the intersections of the lines?
,?
,?
?form an equilateral triangle?
. Find the locus of the center of?
?as?
?ranges over all such triangles.
A?word?is defined as any finite string of letters. A word is a?palindrome?if it reads the same backwards as forwards. Let a sequence of words?,?
,?
,?
?be defined as follows:?
,?
, and for?
,?
?is the word formed by writing?
?followed by?
. Prove that for any?
, the word formed by writing?
,?
,?
,?
?in succession is a palindrome.
Points?,?
,?
,?
,?
?lie on a circle?
?and point?
?lies outside the circle. The given points are such that (i) lines?
?and?
?are tangent to?
, (ii)?
,?
,?
?are collinear, and (iii)?
. Prove that?
?bisects?
.
Consider the assertion that for each positive integer?, the remainder upon dividing?
?by?
?is a power of 4. Either prove the assertion or find (with proof) a counterexample.
Let?. Then?
. Since all perfect squares are congruent to 0 or 1 modulo 3, this means that n must be odd. Proof by Contradiction: We wish to show that the only value of?
?that satisfies is?
. Assume that?
. Then consider the equation?
. From modulo 2, we easily know x is odd. Let?
, where a is an integer.
. Dividing by 4,?
. Since?
,?
, so?
similarly, the entire LHS is an integer, and so are?
?and?
. Thus,?
?must be an integer. Let?
. Then we have?
.?
.?
. Thus, n is even. However, it has already been shown that?
?must be odd. This is a contradiction. Therefore,?
?is not greater than or equal to 2, and must hence be less than 2. The only positive integer less than 2 is 1.
If?, then?
, a perfect square.
If??is odd, then?
.
Since all perfect squares are congruent to?, we have that?
?is not a perfect square for odd?
.
If??is even, then?
?
?
.
Since?, we have that?
?is not a perfect square for even?
.
Thus,??is the only positive integer for which?
?is a perfect square.
Looking at residues mod 3, we see that??must be odd, since even values of?
?leads to?
. Also as shown in solution 2, for?
,?
?must be even. Hence, for?
,?
?can neither be odd nor even. The only possible solution is then?
, which indeed works.
Take the whole expression mod 12. Note that the perfect squares can only be of the form 0, 1, 4 or 9 (mod 12). Note that since the problem is asking for positive integers,??is always divisible by 12, so this will be disregarded in this process. If?
?is even, then?
?and?
. Therefore, the sum in the problem is congruent to?
, which cannot be a perfect square. Now we check the case for which?
?is an odd number greater than 1. Then?
?and?
. Therefore, this sum would be congruent to?
, which cannot be a perfect square. The only case we have not checked is?
. If?
, then the sum in the problem is equal to?
. Therefore the only possible value of?
?such that?
?is a perfect square is?
.
Sinceit is natural to consider a change of variables:
with the inverse mapping given by:
With this change of variables, the constraint becomes
while the left side of the inequality we need to prove is now
Therefore it remains to prove that
We note that the product of the three (positive) terms is 1/8, therefore by AM-GM their mean is at least 1/2, and thus their sum is at least 3/2 and we are done.
Rearranging the condition yields that
Now note that
Summing this for all pairs of??gives that
Note that all the points??belong to the parabola?
?which we will denote?
. This parabola has a focus?
?and directrix?
?which we will denote?
. We will prove that the desired locus is?
.
First note that for any point??on?
, the line?
?is the tangent line to?
?at?
. This is because?
?contains?
?and because?
. If you don't like calculus, you can also verify that?
?has equation?
?and does not intersect?
?at any point besides?
. Now for any point?
?on?
?let?
?be the foot of the perpendicular from?
?onto?
. Then by the definition of parabolas,?
. Let?
?be the perpendicular bisector of?
. Since?
,?
?passes through?
. Suppose?
?is any other point on?
?and let?
?be the foot of the perpendicular from?
?to?
. Then in right?
,?
?is a leg and so?
. Therefore?
?cannot be on?
. This implies that?
?is exactly the tangent line to?
?at?
, that is?
. So we have proved Lemma 1: If?
?is a point on?
?then?
?is the perpendicular bisector of?
.
We need another lemma before we proceed. Lemma 2: If??is on the circumcircle of?
?with orthocenter?
, then the reflections of?
across?
,?
, and?
?are collinear with?
.
Proof of Lemma 2: Say the reflections of??and?
?across?
?are?
?and?
, and the reflections of?
?and?
?across?
?are?
?and?
. Then we angle chase?
?where?
?is the measure of minor arc?
?on the circumcircle of?
. This implies that?
?is on the circumcircle of?
, and similarly?
?is on the circumcircle of?
. Therefore?
, and?
. So?
. Since?
,?
, and?
?are collinear it follows that?
,?
?and?
?are collinear. Similarly, the reflection of?
?over?
?also lies on this line, and so the claim is proved.
Now suppose?,?
, and?
?are three points of?
?and let?
,?
, and?
. Also let?
,?
, and?
?be the midpoints of?
,?
, and?
?respectively. Then since?
?and?
, it follows that?
,?
, and?
?are collinear. By Lemma 1, we know that?
,?
, and?
?are the feet of the altitudes from?
?to?
,?
, and?
. Therefore by the Simson Line Theorem,?
?is on the circumcircle of?
. If?
?is the orthocenter of?
, then by Lemma 2, it follows that?
?is on?
. It follows that the locus described in the problem is a subset of?
.
Since we claim that the locus described in the problem is?, we still need to show that for any choice of?
?on?
?there exists an equilateral triangle with center?
?such that the lines containing the sides of the triangle are tangent to?
. So suppose?
?is any point on?
?and let the circle centered at?
?through?
?be?
. Then suppose?
?is one of the intersections of?
?with?
. Let?
, and construct the ray through?
?on the same halfplane of?
?as?
?that makes an angle of?
?with?
. Say this ray intersects?
?in a point?
?besides?
, and let?
be the perpendicular bisector of?
. Since?
?and?
, we have?
. By the inscribed angles theorem, it follows that?
. Also since?
?and?
?are both radii,?
?is isosceles and?
. Let?
?be the reflection of?
?across?
. Then?
, and so?
. It follows that?
?is on?
, which means?
?is the perpendicular bisector of?
.
Let??intersect?
?in points?
?and?
?and let?
?be the point diametrically opposite to?
?on?
. Also let?
?intersect?
?at?
. Then?
. Therefore?
?is a?
?right triangle and so?
. So?
?and by the inscribed angles theorem,?
. Since?
?it follows that?
?is and equilateral triangle with center?
.
By Lemma 2, it follows that the reflections of??across?
?and?
, call them?
?and?
, lie on?
. Let the intersection of?
?and the perpendicular to?
?through?
?be?
, the intersection of?
?and the perpendicular to?
?through?
?be?
, and the intersection of?
?and the perpendicular to?
?through?
?be?
. Then by the definitions of?
,?
, and?
?it follows that?
?for?
?and so?
,?
, and?
are on?
. By lemma 1,?
,?
, and?
. Therefore the intersections of?
,?
, and?
?form an equilateral triangle with center?
, which finishes the proof. --Killbilledtoucan
Note that the lines??are
respectively. It is easy to deduce that the three points of intersection are
The slopes of each side of this equilateral triangle are
and we want to find the locus of
We know that
for some?
?Therefore, we can use the tangent addition formula to deduce
and
Now we show that?
?can be any real number. Let's say
for some real number?
?Multiplying both sides by?
?and rearranging yields a cubic in?
?Clearly this cubic has at least one real solution. As?
?can take on any real number, all values of?
?are possible, and our answer is the line
Of course, as the denominator could equal 0, we must check?
The left side is nonzero, while the right side is zero, so these values of?
?do not contribute to any values of?
?So, our answer remains the same.
Let??be the reflection function on the set of words, namely?
?for all words?
,?
. Then the following property is evident (e.g. by mathematical induction):
, for any words?
,?
.
a, b, ab, bab, We use mathematical induction to prove the statement of the problem. First,?,?
,?
?are palindromes. Second, suppose?
, and that the words?
?(
,?
,?
,?
) are all palindromes, i.e.?
. Now, consider the word?
:
By the principle of mathematical induction, the statement of the problem is proved.
Let??be the center of the circle, and let?
?be the intersection of?
?and?
. Let?
?be?
?and?
?be?
.
,?
,?
Thus??is a cyclic quadrilateral and?
?and so?
?is the midpoint of chord?
.
~pandadude
Let??be the center of the circle, and let?
?be the midpoint of?
. Let?
?denote the circle with diameter?
. Since?
,?
,?
, and?
?all lie on?
.
Since quadrilateral??is cyclic,?
. Triangles?
?and?
?are congruent, so?
, so?
. Because?
?and?
?are parallel,?
?lies on?
?(using Euclid's Parallel Postulate).
Note that by Lemma 9.9 of EGMO,??is a harmonic bundle. We project through?
?onto?
,
Where?
?is the point at infinity for parallel lines?
?and?
. Thus, we get?
, and?
?is the midpoint of?
.
Connet segment PO, and name the interaction of PO and the circle as point M.
Since PB and PD are tangent to the circle, it's easy to see that M is the midpoint of arc BD.
∠ BOA = 1/2 arc AB + 1/2 arc CE
Since AC // DE, arc AD = arc CE,
thus, ∠ BOA = 1/2 arc AB + 1/2 arc AD = 1/2 arc BD = arc BM = ∠ BOM
Therefore, PBOM is cyclic, ∠ PFO = ∠ OBP = 90°, AF = AC (F is the interaction of BE and AC)
BE bisects AC, proof completed!
We will show that??is a counter-example.
Since?, we see that for any integer?
,?
. Let?
?be the residue of?
. Note that since?
?and?
, necessarily?
, and thus the remainder in question is?
. We want to show that?
?is an odd power of 2 for some?
, and thus not a power of 4.
Let??for some odd prime?
. Then?
. Since 2 is co-prime to?
, we have
and thus
Therefore, for a counter-example, it suffices that??be odd. Choosing?
, we have?
. Therefore,?
?and thus
Since?
?is not a power of 4, we are done.
Lemma (useful for all situations): If??and?
?are positive integers such that?
?divides?
, then?
?divides?
. Proof:?
. Replacing the?
?with a?
?and dividing out the powers of two should create an easy induction proof which will be left to the reader as an Exercise.
Consider?. We will prove that this case is a counterexample via contradiction.
Because?, we will assume there exists a positive integer?
?such that?
?divides?
?and?
. Dividing the powers of?
?from LHS gives?
?divides?
. Hence,?
?divides?
. Because?
?is odd,?
?divides?
. Euler's theorem gives?
?and so?
. However,?
, a contradiction. Thus,?
?is a valid counterexample.
? 2025. All Rights Reserved. 沪ICP备2023009024号-1